Forerunner 205 Reviews

cooldogg90's picture

Love my 205

submitted by cooldogg90 on June 19, 2008
Parent nodes
1
2
3
4
5
Pros: 
Easy to use, accurate and sturdy...
Cons: 
Takes a while to acquire satelite at times, not waterproof, no HRM

I love my Garmin 205, I've run several marathons and halfs with it and it beats having a footpod to deal with. I've recently starting training for tri's and the quick release mount/wristband works perfectly. My only complaint is that it can take a while to hookup to the satelite. You definitely want to turn it on before you get to your race site. I'll be upgrading to a 305 or 405 soon to start tracking HR and cadence.

Price Paid: 
$299.00
Model Year: 
2006
theShiba's picture

Solid Pacing Tool

submitted by theShiba on December 28, 2007
Parent nodes
1
2
3
4
5
Pros: 
Rechargeable Battery, Compact size, Two straps (small and large)
Cons: 
Smaller Display (vs. 201), no HRM (vs. 305), no real effective Battery indicator

I love this device. It's been nothing but reliable, and has gotten me through an entire year of running without sign of letting up. The battery stays charged for several runs, although there isn't a great way to tell how much battery you have left.

Other models have better bike integration, and even HRM capabilities, but for the money, this device is a great value. There is a feature for multisport detection based on speed, but I have never used the feature because I prefer to just rely on my conventional cycometer.

Price Paid: 
$199.99
Model Year: 
2006