Quantcast

A Change to Swim Starts?

T70's picture
Posts
5
Member
989 days
started by T70 on July 13, 2007

Recently reading the webpage for an upcoming Oly about a change in their swim start. They are going with a time trial format. The elite wave will go first, no change there, but all of the rest of the AGers will start as singles at 3 second intervals. A friend of mine said he heard the race is doing this at the request of the DNR (Minnesota) which is concerned about mass swim start drownings? Has anyone else heard of this concern and do you think more tri's will follow suit? Of course my friend could be full of it:)...he is the one who talked me into IMWI. I would hate to think what the DNR would think of that swim!

vanjames's picture
Posts
560
Member
1750 days
vanjames posted 2 years ago.

Memphis in May has always been that format from what I understand and everyone likes it. The diff is 1-3 seconds there. Makes it a true time trial race.

I did IM Australia this year and they seed swim zones based on previous swim times (you wear diff color caps per zone). Its still a mass start but you have less people around you to worry about - by the time you catch up to slower swimmers the field had opened up enough that there was much less commotion.

mgetting's picture
Posts
44
Member
941 days
mgetting posted 2 years ago.

When I did the Memphis in May Tri last year they did 3 second intervals - I think it worked pretty well, especially for my first tri. I've done a mass start and I like the 3 sec interval start to get your bearings before catching people, getting caught, etc

RV's picture
Posts
3471
Member
1768 days
RV posted 2 years ago.

I've heard of other tri's using that format. Never participated in one set up that way. For smaller races not too bad - would slow things down when having a large race. 1000 people @ 3 sec = 50 min. If 1000 people with 100 per wave @ 2 min = 20 min.

Who wants to miss out of a mass IM start with 2500 other athletes?!
See ya at IMWI!

Triguy98's picture
Posts
2807
Member
1686 days
Triguy98 posted 2 years ago.

I hate the time trial starts. You stand there waiting for your turn to run into the water, in my case it was a 35 minute wait. Not fun. Doesnt really do much as 3 seconds between people of similar skill is a tiny gap and is often made up by the bike. You still get drafting, but in smaller numbers. I prefer the hustle and bustle of a real start. Something about toeing the line with everyone else at the same time, rather than spread out in a long line.

Life is short. Play hard and get dirty doing it.

UFTriGator's picture
Posts
1210
Member
1340 days
UFTriGator posted 2 years ago.

Plus, sprint finishes don't mean anything with a time trial start.

______________________________________________
-Matt
Not fast enough.

LongTime's picture
Posts
112
Member
987 days
LongTime posted 2 years ago.

How many people drown in triathlons? Really.

triNick's picture
Posts
492
Member
1621 days
triNick posted 2 years ago.

I think you are talking about the Turtleman triathlon.

If so, they previously had self-seeding swim start mass waves of up to 100 people i think, i forgot the actual number of people in each wave it might of been less. The did this for the last 2 years which was really nice. I liked it, I didn't have to battle with people that didn't want to swim fast. For the newbies it was nice, they could wait towards the end and make sure to swim with people their own speed.

I'm not sure why they implemented the change but I'm pretty sure they got a new race director at the end of last years race, maybe that had something to do with it also. I might not have been the DNR but the sherriff's department. I know that in another local race not to far away the sherriff's department request that the age-group waves start 10 minute apart, which was a little ridiculous, it use to be 2 or 3 minutes before and this was only a sprint distance race. I started a whole hour after the first wave went off.

The Life Time Fitness Triathlon that's going on tomorrow is that way for the sprint distance race for sure (time trial start), but I'm not 100% on the Olympic distance swim start. This race gets a ton of newbies, i think in the race last year had somehere between 600 and 800 first timers. They do it this way for them, or that's what i've heard. For many people doing this race it's a long day with this type of start especially because they close the transition area so early and you just have to wait and wait around, up to 2 hours before it's time to start.

I wish someone would implement a combo swim format start where the people that want to do a mass start say in a group of 50 to 100 start and then the people that want a time trial format start after that. It would shorten the time spent waiting to start for some people that just want to go no matter what. With this option you would pick what type of start you want. They would just have to have a timing matt close to the entrance of the water for accurate times.

There have been several deaths this year during the swim, I know of at least 4, but I think 2 of them have been heart attack related, not 100% on the other but I don't think they were drowning related. In a race just within the last 2 weeks, one person died and several other peopel where plucked out of the water by the authorities on the scene. The death was heart attack related but the other might have been near drownings or something else.

While there might be a higher chance of drowning in a mass start it can be prevented with proper planning on our part. We never plan on getting hit in the face by people kicking but it can happen. My swim at IM Switzerland was tough, I had someones feet in my facce for the first 10 minutes and I really couldn't slow down because people were hitting my feet and it was solid people on both sides of me. I chose to be there and that what I got, but for others this could be a bit scary. If you are a weak swimmer, start on the sides or wait until everyone is in the water.

I'll be at Turtleman this year, we'll just have to see what happens.

TRImapper.com - visual triathlon finder
TRIJUICE.com - triathlon news and resource site

mdd's picture
Posts
375
Member
1190 days
mdd posted 2 years ago.

LongTime;73139 wrote:
How many people drown in triathlons? Really.

Wow what a statement. Why don't you ask that of the families who lost loved ones this year? You really need to think before you post. If ONE PERSON drowns then that is too many.

I don't have the answer for how to prevent it because really the only thing that will work is for people to know their limits and stay out of a race if the mass start is too much for them but it is a free country and people can take that risk if they want. However, your comment is completely out of line and shows a lack of respect for those that have died competing in this great sport.

:(

Anton's picture
Posts
3892
Member
1723 days
Anton posted 2 years ago.

I sometimes think that people feel this sport is somewhat risk free.
It's not. People die in the swim,bike accidents can be brutal and I've been on the run and seen people being administered CPR...
I don't think we'll ever know how many exactly...I'm not sure that info is readily available...It's not the kind of thing that RD's or the owners of race management companies broadcast...Or how many lawsuits there are every year over this kind of thing.
That being said, safety is prime concern of racing organiizations and it should be ours too. Without an eye to safety the number of triathlons would dwindle...Tri's offer far more potential for death and injury than a 5k or even a marathon or an ultra for that matter.
If a race format keeps people safer or gives the impression that people are safer...I'm all for it.

"If e wishes to sweem in dangerous waters, oo are we to deny im?
-Chef Skinner
http://antonspath.blogspot.com

goldsmithnb's picture
Posts
27
Member
970 days
goldsmithnb posted 2 years ago.

I did a sprint a couple of years ago and we started 3 seconds apart. the first man was done with the race before I got in the water. i like the mass starts better.

"Age doesn't bring wisdom; miles do."

watrbg2's picture
Posts
173
Member
1723 days
watrbg2 posted 2 years ago.

LongTime;73139 wrote:
How many people drown in triathlons? Really.

Really??? I knew someone who drowned at a triathlon, not very well but I did know him. It's not a good feeling.

Sometimes bad things happen but I think that we could all use a little more common sense and courtesy towards our fellow triathletes. I just saying this because I'm the owner of a black eye and a nice cut under my eye from having my googles smashed into my face at the Muncie HIM. It was towards the end of the swim and there was no one swimming near me but the idiot had to swim over me and through me instead of moving over a little. I know that kind of thing happens during a mass start and even during a time trail start (I was at IMWI last year with a 2475 swimmer mass start). But at the end of the swim when everyone is spread out that kind of thing is totally uncalled for. We have to take care of each other as much as we can.

'In a world that tries its hardest to separate us from what matters, the Ironman helps us to reconnect with the pulse of our lives." - Scott Tinley

BigGus's picture
Posts
132
Member
1033 days
BigGus posted 2 years ago.

There are strict rules regarding lane position, passing and blocking on the bike, there are unwritten rules for the run (you would never run over someone, push or kick them to pass) so why do so many of us lose our sportsmanship during the swim? Yes, it is a competition, but let's all be respectful of each other, and more important, let's all be safe. There is no reason to swim over somebody or flail and kick wildly. We all need to observe proper etiquette during the swim. IMHO, there should be referees riding on the back of the lifeguards boards and anybody caught swimming over someone else should be penalized.

kylie's picture
Posts
5318
Member
2000 days
kylie posted 2 years ago.

I'll admit it: I've swam over some one. But I haven't ever kicked someone on the run, but I can imagine a time a would. When? Well, if I was running into a glare which meant I couldn't even see the edges of the road or where my own feet were, and if I had on sunglasses that made everything distorted, and the air was so smoggy my hands swinging at my sides weren't visible.

Basically what I'm trying to say is that it's not (ever, in my experience) on purpose that I bump/run into someone in the swim. But instead it's not being able to see well (glare or murky water). Or I've talked to people who felt bad, but ran into people or cut them off because they aren't used to the passing time in the water. They swim in a pool, in a lane, they bike alone, they run alone. It's just easier to gauge speed and safe distance on the run and bike.

On purpose, yes, should be a penalty. And we should all be careful. But we should also remember there is a good chance the person didn't mean it.

Miles of Life --- Powered by MarkyV

watrbg2's picture
Posts
173
Member
1723 days
watrbg2 posted 2 years ago.

kyillee;73327 wrote:
I'll admit it: I've swam over some one. But I haven't ever kicked someone on the run, but I can imagine a time a would. When? Well, if I was running into a glare which meant I couldn't even see the edges of the road or where my own feet were, and if I had on sunglasses that made everything distorted, and the air was so smoggy my hands swinging at my sides weren't visible.

Basically what I'm trying to say is that it's not (ever, in my experience) on purpose that I bump/run into someone in the swim. But instead it's not being able to see well (glare or murky water). Or I've talked to people who felt bad, but ran into people or cut them off because they aren't used to the passing time in the water. They swim in a pool, in a lane, they bike alone, they run alone. It's just easier to gauge speed and safe distance on the run and bike.

On purpose, yes, should be a penalty. And we should all be careful. But we should also remember there is a good chance the person didn't mean it.

I probably didn't explain myself very well, so here it goes again. I know people don't mean to bump into others on the swim, sometimes you can't help it. That's just the way an open water swim is. What I don't like is the people who bump into you and instead of backing off a little, continue to swim over top of you.

To use your running analogy, you bump someone while running and instead of backing off a little, you push them to the ground and run over their back. You wouldn't do that on the run and you shouldn't do it on the swim.

'In a world that tries its hardest to separate us from what matters, the Ironman helps us to reconnect with the pulse of our lives." - Scott Tinley

kylie's picture
Posts
5318
Member
2000 days
kylie posted 2 years ago.

yeah, I knew what you were getting it... I should have been more clear :) I was more addressing BigGus' talk of penalties and sportsmanship.

Miles of Life --- Powered by MarkyV