Newton Running Shoe's
I've been wondering about these! Let us know what you think tomorrow.
______________________________________________
-Matt
Not fast enough.
If they can take 7 minutes off my marathon time to qualify for Boston I'd pony up the money. :D
Let us know what you think.
john
Pain is inevitable. Suffering is optional.
They had an expo at FL 70.3 as well, and a lot of people picked up a pair. As I would see them on the run (which was muddy and got their nice neon shoes dirty) I wuold ask how they felt, most of which just grunted or said they couldn't notice a difference - probably because they were running on fumes at that point anyways. That being said, I ran around in them for a while and they do feel like they could help especially in the forefoot running comfort. I think its one of those things that makes the really fast a little fast and the rest of us get a boost from confidence and good looks.
I know a few folks that have them. Some love them and others have achilles tendon problems. It looks like the toe section is built up. It might put the ankle in dorsi flexion causing more tension on the tendon. I guess the theory behind these shoes is to make you more of a forefoot runner.
I think this style comes more with increased speed anyway. How many elite marathoners are wearing them?
INITIAL RUN REVIEW
"Preceptions vs. Realities"
Run Data- 1:00:00, 8.38 miles, 7:08 pace, 148HR
My run this morning in the Newtons was on a rec path along a canal her near my office. It is very flat, with a few short, steep up and downs into pedestrian tunnels to cross under a few roads. My heart rate is at the high end of my aerobic training zone, so from an effort standpoint, this is my normal exertion for a 60min run.
The first 2 miles in the Newtons felt very different, but not as I had expected. They felt much less cushioned than my Nike Haywards and somewhat stiff and flat. I did not feel any sense of forward assist from the lug system in the forefoot, although I'm not sure why I thought I would. I concentrated on maintaining a high 80-90 cadence and ran without my iPod so I could listen to my feet. When I run, I always try and land lightly and immediately scrap my foot back propelling me forward. If I can hear that slight scraping sound, I know I am imparting momentun forward and not wasting it by bouncing up. As I am not a heel striker by nature, so the running on my toe's concept is something I always try and do, so again the shoe's positioning wasn't noticeabley different. My initial perception was that I wasn't running as fast as I thought.
As the run progressed and I warmed up and lossened up, things began to change. First was when I came to the first pedestrian underpass. These shoes feel great running down hill. Suddenly the shoe geometry really kicked in for me and keeping my stride short, your turnover increases and you can really fly down a hill with less pounding caused by making the mistake of overstriding the downhills. Then when it came time to climb back up to the path.....OH MY GOD! These shoe's are a revolution in hill climbing! It has never felt so effortless climbing. Suddenly I was really up on my toes and I absolutley flew up the hill. Now, I run hills all the time and consider myself a strong hill climber but this felt profoundly different in a very good way.
As I came into the last 2 miles, I began to be able to put it all together. What I preceived as flat and less cushioned was actually me completely eliminating any bounce in my stride. Sometimes I think I can fool myself into thinking I'm moving quickly when I start to get a little bouncey when in reality, I'm wasting time and energy moving up and down and not forward. The shoes were forcing me to push myself forward with every step. They felt very efficient in providing me with the correct mechanics to maintain good form and running economy. Whereas my initial perception was that I didn't feel that much different, the reality was that I was running very differently. Whereas before I porbably only held perfect form when I though about it, now it seemed I was doing it without the same mental effort and not slipping into old, bad habits.
Post run, my legs didn't feel as fatigued from the normal pounding of a good hard run. Again, I attribute this to the shoes preventing me from engaging in the poor form of bouncing too much. My quads and calves feel a little more tired as they have been engaged in a different way, but nothing very noticeable. I will be very curious to get out and run a more varied elevation run.
So my first impression is very favorable. $175 worth of favorable? More testing will tell. I will continue to update this thread, so keep an eye on it!
_______
Bryan
Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
great review, it's good to hear someone with some experience describe how they feel. keep us posted
did you notice any difference in pace?
did you notice any difference in pace?
Not really. At 148 HR, I should be going right about that pace. In order to evaluate them based on pace, I'm going to need to put in a lot of run's and try and draw some conclusions with previous sessions. The problem is that it's getting so hot here, so my HR is elevated above where I trained so long uring the fall, winter, and spring. So I need to give the Newton's time to show me if they can make me quicker. Speed isn't the only benefit that cna be derived, however. Perhaps they will improve my form to a point where my recovery from runs is faster and I feel much more fresh. All of that might be of benefit come race day.
Bottom line is that if they don't provide a tangible benefit, I won't spend the $ and they won't come to Kona.
_______
Bryan
Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
well, definitely keep the updates coming as you keep puting miles on them. I've been interested in these shoes for a while and there really doesn't seem to be a whole lot of unbiased info out there on them. I'll be interested to see what you think after some serious time in them.
Just my .02 on the Newtons - I've been using them for about 3 - 4weeks. I am a forefoot runner, so not much difference on flats. I noticed it most on downhills as well - keeps me forward. I have picked up my pace - but whether that is the shoes or just the result of training - hard to say. The other thing that I believe is attributable to the shoes is that my legs recover faster after long runs.
RV
It takes a long time to get good. - Scott Molina
Slow is smooth; smooth is fast. - Rich Strauss
I bought the "Distance" model which is sort of funny because they really are a racing flat...I'd be daft to use them on anything over 10K. Have been using them for road races and they seem fine. Very light but that also makes them flimsey. They don't seem anywhere near as durable as my old flats...and I'm suspect of the durability of the cushioning. Time will tell. I do seem to have a quicker turn over. I am stoked on the color, though...reminds me of 70's neon..
"What would life be if we had no courage to attempt anything?" - Vincent Van Gogh
My Blog: http://agingsuperhero.blogspot.com
Me too, I feel very retro in them. I remember well that first Nike waffle sole shoe in what, '74-'75? My mom bought a pair when they first came out and started running. Jim Fixx even lived in our town when he wrote The Book. My mom was probably one of the earliest adopters of jogging as excercise in our town. People thought she was nuts!
Funny how that apple didn't fall far from the tree.........:)
_______
Bryan
Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
SECOND RUN REVIEW
"Does the Honeymoon Continue?"
Run Data- 1:00:00, 8.51 miles, 7:03 pace, 148HR
This run was a repeat of my last run on Tuesday, same route and same HR. My pace was better by :05/mile and I covered an additional .12miles in the same 1 hour. You know what that means? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!!!!! Way too many variables to draw any conclusions, both internal and external. Although my HR was the exact same, the temps were noticeably cooler and that alone can account for the pick up in pace. As I am a sample of one, it's going to take some time before I feel I can comment on weather or not these shoe's actually make me a faster runner.
Todays run started the same as Tuesday, the shoe's feel flat and my perception was that I was working hard yet my HR told a different tale. I think I can definately attribute this mis-perception on my part to the Newton's themselves. The lug acctuator system built under the forefoot is very different in design form my Nike Haywards. When I land on my forefoot in the Nike's, due to their relatively generour cushioning, there is a natural tendency to have an immediate recoil. That recoil wants to bounce you up but as long as you hold form and push backwrads, you impart momentum in the correct direction: forward. The Newton's, and I felt this in my first review, have no upward recoil. Instead, as per their own description, the lug system loads under pressure and release stored energy forward, which is good, but I don't feel it because I keep expecting my little Nike bounce!
As the run progressed, again I would check my cadence every 5-10min and was very steady at 90. As the miles wound down, again I became very aware that I felt very good technically and pretty fresh. It's been about 2 hours since I finished and I had a chance to stretch. My hamstrings felt a bit tighter than normal, and a bit in my glut's. I need to acclimate myself a bit with the shoe's, but I am also trying to be sensetive to any new ache's or oains which might flare up and to report them. These two runs are on a concrete rec path, and that always causes some soreness for me.
Long run this weekend out on the roads should be very interesting!
_______
Bryan
Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
How does their sizing compare to other brands you have used? One concern I have is ordering them sight unseen and then getting the wrong size. Keep the reviews coming, it is good to hear from an experienced racer regarding this product who understands that a slight difference in times can occur for 100 reasons other than the shoes.

For me, they seem to run the same size as my Nike Haywards.
_______
Bryan
Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
I wear an 11 in Nike and Asics..bought the newtons in 11..spot on.
Wow Red...My first real pair of shoes was a pair of Nike Boston '73
God I loved those shoes...DNF'd my first Marthon in them! (went out too fast.) Folks thought (think?) I'm nuts too.
I just realized I can name my first 10 pairs of real running shoes...but can't remember where I left the car keys! (Yikes!)
"What would life be if we had no courage to attempt anything?" - Vincent Van Gogh
My Blog: http://agingsuperhero.blogspot.com
I wear an 11 in Nike and Asics..bought the newtons in 11..spot on.Wow Red...My first real pair of shoes was a pair of Nike Boston '73
God I loved those shoes...DNF'd my first Marthon in them! (went out too fast.) Folks thought (think?) I'm nuts too.
I just realized I can name my first 10 pairs of real running shoes...but can't remember where I left the car keys! (Yikes!)
but who needs car keys when you have a bike right?:p
-----------------------------------------------
Base 1 (Week 2, 16.5hrs)
Check out my blog!
I'll be posting more on my thoughts later this week, but Katja Schumacher took first place at the Florida 70.3 and Badman just won Eagleman...both run in Newtons.
_______
Bryan
Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
My bike lock key is on the key ring...duh! ;)
"What would life be if we had no courage to attempt anything?" - Vincent Van Gogh
My Blog: http://agingsuperhero.blogspot.com
THIRD RUN REVIEW
"Another Week, Nothing New"
Run Data- 1:00:00, 8.35 miles, 7:11 pace, 148HR
Same run I did twice last week. One of the benefits of training with HR for as long as I have is that despite all other variables being out of your control, I'm a champ at managing my HR. I f I need to average 148bpm fore 60min, I can nail it every time. That's good for consitancy in my review of these, but it's still only one variable. I'm begining to feel that, all things being equal, at this distance there are no appreciable differences between any good running shoes, at least for me. I don't feel any better or any worse, although I do enjoy certain aspect of these short, fast, flat runs in the Netwons as opposed to my Nike's. They do ebncourage a nice fast turnover and good forward purpulsion as opposed to excessive up and down. That feeling is very tangible. They do perfrom great on hills, as I have said. 8 miles, though, is just not proving one way or another any true benefit or disadvantage, so unlesss soemthing extraordinary happens, I'm going to wait until I get into IM distance training next month to continue my comments.
For the cost, for a good runner competing in short course, you are probably just as well off with a traditional racing shoe or light trainer.
_______
Bryan
Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
For the cost, for a good runner competing in short course, you are probably just as well off with a traditional racing shoe or light trainer.
What about for a weak runner (7:30 pace on short course)? Would these shoes be a good option? I already have a brand/model of shoe that works well for me (no blisters, comfortable, etc) and would be nervous about changing although if it cut some time off my run I would be willing to take a chance.

this thread is about 500 times easier to read here than the one you have going on slowtwitch. Not nearly as many posts randomly hating on newtons and making judgements on your motives. thanks for taking the time to give your thoughts on the shoes, it'll be interesting to see if you get a different perspective once you start putting in more miles.
MDD- I would keep doing exactly what you are doing. I think it's best to first learn proper form and then mess with the equiptment to fine tune.
sgeddes- Yes, this is the kindler, gentler thread! I have to admit, I do love battling over on ST with those guys. Never have so many who know so little gathered to say so much!
_______
Bryan
Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
OK, I just wanted to bump this thread for a final wrap up from me. I ran the Newton's for 2 weeks now, including a long run last Sunday of 13.6 miles. I ran twice during the week, each 8.3 miles just as I had before with no appreciable difference in feel or speed. Today I did the exact same long run as last week. I left at the same time in the morning, I was coming off of a 65 mile ride the day before in both cases and my average HR was within 1 bpm of each other. The only difference is that today I wore my Haywards. The two runs were comlpleted with 18 second of each other over a 13.6 mile run.
In conclussion, for me, the Newtons don't seem to offer any specific advanatge over my Haywards and I find the additional padding and comfort of the Haywards superior. Also, the Newtons are already showing appreciable signs of wear in a very short time.
For the cost and efficacy, I am going back to Nike.
-Be the person your dog thinks you are!
_______
Bryan
Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
I liked running in the Newtons, but after about a month of running with them the lugs have worn down significantly. Pretty disappointing especially considering the cost. :(
RV
It takes a long time to get good. - Scott Molina
Slow is smooth; smooth is fast. - Rich Strauss
thank you for the information on the shoes. I have not heard a lot about them yet. I watched a couple of people come in on a race wearing them and they seem like they take some getting used to. What do you think now that you have worn them?
I like that they are lite, but don't seem to have too much endurance. They are pretty comfortable - moreso since some of the lugs wore down, so that is probably counter-productive. I'm racing a HIM with them Sunday. I do not plan on getting a second pair.
I actually tried the Haywards, but they only go up to a size 12, so I am still kinda looking for a new shoe.
RV
It takes a long time to get good. - Scott Molina
Slow is smooth; smooth is fast. - Rich Strauss









I had read a number of articles regarding Newton shoes in the weeks prior to IMAZ. At the race expo, Newton had set up a demonstartion area where you could take a pair for a run around. I gave them a spin and found them...very interesting. For more info on their history, design, and claimed benefits, visit there web site:
http://newtonrunning.com/
I read a number of different reviews and opinions of some of the very early adopters, ranging from they feel great to those who couldn't run a mile without pain. A local triathlete friend also bought a pair at IMAZ and has been running in them for over a month. He likes them, and ran what for him was an impressive 10K for him at a race we did 2 weeks ago. My concern looking at his shoe's was that they seemed very worn already.
So I decided to hold off buying these as the jury was clearly out, but I made the error of mentioning them to my mom, who promptly bought herself and me a pair. I purchsed the men's Gravity Trainer:
http://www.newtonrunning.com/shoe.php?s=001
So, what do you get for $175 beans! They arrived with a nice carry bag, orange and white laces, a pair of Newton socks, and a nice headsweat cap! An hour run on for tomorrow, stay tuned!
_______
Bryan
Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!