Quantcast

Wheels....

matt414's picture
Posts
17
Member
812 days
started by matt414 on September 17, 2006

Okay, so I am kinda new to all this. Learning as I go. Anyhow, I am wondering about wheels. It seems that zipp is the big name. Are they really worth it? I've been looking and doing some price shopping and found what seems to be a good deal on a pair of 404 tubulars. I don't want clinchers. Another thing, I've heard that wheels don't really make much of a difference until your over 19 mph. I spend most of my time, training at least, around 20-22, so will they really help much? Thanks for the help.

mdd's picture
Posts
367
Member
826 days
mdd posted 2 years ago.

Zip 404s are an excellent all around wheel set to have. Whether it is windy or hilly or flat or whatever you will be in good position to be successful.

trithis04's picture
Posts
414
Member
1367 days
trithis04 posted 2 years ago.

Yup, 404s are a nice setup. I would say your right, I don't know if 19 mph. is the "magical" number, but certainly the faster you go the bigger the benefit. You should also see a nice weight savings.

[FONT=Impact]-Jason
"Fatigue will make cowards of us all!"

JamieM's picture
Posts
834
Member
1363 days
JamieM posted 2 years ago.

Zipps are definitely a great upgrade. I've got a set of 303's that I picked up used and have been astounded by the difference in weight and feel.

mdd's picture
Posts
367
Member
826 days
mdd posted 2 years ago.

I also think it is nice to have a race set and training set. No reason to waste endless miles on a top of the line set of Zipps or something of that nature.

glbrum's picture
Posts
835
Member
1370 days
glbrum posted 2 years ago.

Zipp's are nice. That's for sure. My only gripe with Zipp is that they are so much more than others such as HED, Blackwell Research, etc.
They are slightly lighter, perhaps 100-200 grams, but does that much weight make a big difference, no. The hubs are a little better on the Zipps. Enough to make a difference? maybe a few seconds. Let's look at Hed Stinger 60 (front)/ 90 (rear) combo. Very similar to the Zipp 606 set. The Zipp's are about $600 more and for what? a couple hundred grams and a few seconds because of a slightly smoother hub........Bottom Line: Once you enter the level of wheels that the 404 or similar is at, you're not going to be faster on a given wheelset. (Disk excluded) You are simply paying for a name.

kicker's picture
Posts
53
Member
1241 days
kicker posted 2 years ago.

good advice glbrum. A buddy of mine bought a pair of HED 3's while I went with the Zipp 404 clincher, and I'm now selling the clincher. The wheels are great, but to me, they aren't worth the extra $500, so I'm going to put them on ebay with only 3 races (2 half IMs and 1 full IM) and go with a used pair of Hed Alps tubulars because they are cheaper.

catwood's picture
Posts
849
Member
1479 days
catwood posted 2 years ago.

I agree with glbrum about paying for the name. I have a pair of Nimble Fly tubulars (comparable to zipp 303s) that I use for all my tri's. They are only 100g heavier a set but the entire set costs less than just the rear zipp. Its also a small company with excellent service and you get a custom spoke configuration depending on your weight, riding style, etc... I am totally in love with Nimble wheels. I actually have a set of Spiders too that I use for my collegiate cycling races (they tend to take more of a beating and I'm too lazy to change the tubulars more than once every 2 years or so)... Maybe once I graduate I'll get myself a pair of Crosswinds too...

RV's picture
Posts
3354
Member
1404 days
RV posted 2 years ago.

I ride on HED-3's. I have the clincher, but the HED-3c is tubular and a smidge lighter. The HEDs are very durable. I race and train on them. Have had them for 2 years with no issues whatsoever. I like being able to use the wheels rather than have them look pretty in the basement and only run on race day. Using them in training I get to experience all the wind, weather conditions and road conditions and therefore I am confident in how they respond.

RV

It takes a long time to get good. - Scott Molina
Slow is smooth; smooth is fast. - Rich Strauss

wesmeyer11's picture
Posts
173
Member
893 days
wesmeyer11 posted 2 years ago.

check blackwell and tokken...I have the zipp 808's great wheels but I just saw blackwell has a 100mm deep dish, more than my 808s for way less than I paid for the 808s.

trithis04's picture
Posts
414
Member
1367 days
trithis04 posted 2 years ago.

Look, at some point the added engineering, technology, and the benefits that result from it have to add to the bottom line. Other wheel manufactures have reached a certain threshold with their efforts, Zipp has surpassed that (good examples above), so you pay for it. It's that way for most technology leaders manufacturing bike components, i.e. Zipp, Lightweight, and Zero Gravity to name a few.

I'd be much quicker to point out and critize a company like Campagnolo, slow to revise or improve product lines, yet prices are still high. In most cases, more than the few hundred bucks. Take their Ghibli Disc or Record crank and BB set-up. The disc cost $2500 alone ($1495 for a Zipp), and weights in at 103 grams more than a Zipp 900 disc (995 v. 892). You still can't get out-board bearings with the Record groupo (2006). I've got outboard bearings on my cross-bike with a FSA Gossamer crankset. And finally, if your not quite convinced to run out and suck up all Campy's high tech. wizzardy, there's the Bora wheelset, similar to the 404 only $2,800 per set and again another hunderd grams or so heavier. Great DEALS!!!

I'll pay for the added efforts and maybe marginal benefits that come with them, I've worked hard enough training I'll take what I can get. Utimately, each person has to decide whether the extra $$ is worth it. But Crappy, they need to stop resting on their REP. and catch up. Hey, as long as people buy it!

[FONT=Impact]-Jason
"Fatigue will make cowards of us all!"

Triguy98's picture
Posts
2438
Member
1322 days
Triguy98 posted 2 years ago.

Perhaps they do add to the bottom line, but it is basically a name thing. Kinda like Nike and their $130 shoes. Paying for the marketing. Not to say Zipps arent better than some wheels out there, but the gap between them and a lower price wheel...say the HED Stinger... is not as much as some would want it to be.

As long as people buy the "advances" in technology, like dimples, people will line up to buy Zipps product. But the wind tunnel doesnt lie, and the Zipps are NOT heads and heels above the rest. Lightweights and Xentis didnt test out better than a lot of the mid cost entries either.

I am going to dig up the tunnels tests and pst the data for you when I find em.

Life is short. Play hard and get dirty doing it.

trithis04's picture
Posts
414
Member
1367 days
trithis04 posted 2 years ago.

Triguy,

I agree to a certain extent. There is marginal aerodynamic benefits, but it is there. Second, Zipp wheelsets are among the lightest whethter mid-V, deep-V, or disc. Now, I know this is marginal too, but in a sport where people are known to pay by the gram it seems logical to charge a premium.

I've owned two seperate sets of Zipps and could not be happier. In fact, I just did a new build and went with Zipp again. I'm comfortable with quality and performance of the product. In most cases, not all, you get what you pay for. If they are not doing me any good in comparison to a less expensive setup, at I least I think they are, sometimes that what really matters! HA!

[FONT=Impact]-Jason
"Fatigue will make cowards of us all!"