Quantcast

Training with Cranksets

jerallen's picture
Posts
114
Member
668 days
started by jerallen on June 4, 2008

So I recently got a new ride and I didn't realize the crankset was a 55-44 set. So on my hilly ride this weekend, i kept wondering why it was so tough to turn the pedals. Has anyone every heard of training with a bigger crankset then switching to say a 53-39 for the race? My two A races this year are lake stevens 70.3 and IMKY, so I am doing lots of hillwork.

TriSooner's picture
Posts
850
Member
245 days
TriSooner posted 11 weeks ago.

I've never heard of it, but I think it could mess you up, at least in terms of instinctively finding gears and the best cadence. I think that after training on specific crank/cassette combo, knowing which gear to be in becomes ingrained. Changing cranks at the last minute might get you out of your rythm. Or not.

UFTriGator's picture
Posts
1114
Member
883 days
UFTriGator posted 11 weeks ago.

That sounds kind of silly. No one really needs a 55t front ring (maybe Fabian Cancellara?). Using a 44t small ring just kills your "bail out" if you hit a big hill. As far as I know, all the guys I race run 53t chainrings at all the ITU races and the non-drafting pro races (I'm sure there are exceptions, but I haven't noticed anything crazy).

I think 55t chainrings exist for roadies who got really excited that they broke an hour in a 40k and needed a new, oversized chainring because they're so strong. Truth is, you go :54 in a 40k with a 53t chainring just fine (assuming you can push 330W for that long).

If I were you, I'd just switch over to a 53-39 to make sure you're used to it. If you swith right before the race, you might be fine.....or you might not be able to find a gear that you're comfortable in because you're not used to the gear ratios.

edit: I started writing this before TriSooner posted and got distracted before I finished.....but looks like we pretty much said the same thing.

______________________________________________
-Matt
Not fast enough.

ChunkyB's picture
Posts
979
Member
311 days
ChunkyB posted 11 weeks ago.

I would just push harder gears on your training rides. You don't need a new crank, just choose higher gears. I doubt you'll ever run out of room in the higher gears. Just my $0.02.

"The melting point of wax means nothing to me": Thrice

My Blog

jerallen's picture
Posts
114
Member
668 days
jerallen posted 11 weeks ago.

Good points everyone, I will switch to the 53-39. I would never buy a 55t chainring on my own, but for some reason Felt stocks the 2007 DA with it.

TriSooner's picture
Posts
850
Member
245 days
TriSooner posted 11 weeks ago.

UFTriGator wrote:
edit: I started writing this before TriSooner posted and got distracted before I finished.....but looks like we pretty much said the same thing.

Yes, but your answer is more technical :) Gear ratios and combinations hurt my brain. I just know what feels right.

jhudalla's picture
Posts
328
Member
211 days
jhudalla posted 11 weeks ago.

I know I could have used a bailout - I run a 55/11 and daym... the 'HILL' at IMC nearly killed me. People were walking up that muther... I stupidly ( or not ) pounded it. I was fried afterwards.

Do w/ the 53

Weary is the path that does not challenge.