Quantcast

Training with Cranksets

jerallen's picture
Posts
117
Member
1244 days
started by jerallen on June 4, 2008

So I recently got a new ride and I didn't realize the crankset was a 55-44 set. So on my hilly ride this weekend, i kept wondering why it was so tough to turn the pedals. Has anyone every heard of training with a bigger crankset then switching to say a 53-39 for the race? My two A races this year are lake stevens 70.3 and IMKY, so I am doing lots of hillwork.

TriSooner's picture
Posts
2433
Member
821 days
TriSooner posted 1 year ago.

I've never heard of it, but I think it could mess you up, at least in terms of instinctively finding gears and the best cadence. I think that after training on specific crank/cassette combo, knowing which gear to be in becomes ingrained. Changing cranks at the last minute might get you out of your rythm. Or not.

UFTriGator's picture
Posts
1210
Member
1459 days
UFTriGator posted 1 year ago.

That sounds kind of silly. No one really needs a 55t front ring (maybe Fabian Cancellara?). Using a 44t small ring just kills your "bail out" if you hit a big hill. As far as I know, all the guys I race run 53t chainrings at all the ITU races and the non-drafting pro races (I'm sure there are exceptions, but I haven't noticed anything crazy).

I think 55t chainrings exist for roadies who got really excited that they broke an hour in a 40k and needed a new, oversized chainring because they're so strong. Truth is, you go :54 in a 40k with a 53t chainring just fine (assuming you can push 330W for that long).

If I were you, I'd just switch over to a 53-39 to make sure you're used to it. If you swith right before the race, you might be fine.....or you might not be able to find a gear that you're comfortable in because you're not used to the gear ratios.

edit: I started writing this before TriSooner posted and got distracted before I finished.....but looks like we pretty much said the same thing.

______________________________________________
-Matt
Not fast enough.

ChunkyB's picture
Posts
1037
Member
887 days
ChunkyB posted 1 year ago.

I would just push harder gears on your training rides. You don't need a new crank, just choose higher gears. I doubt you'll ever run out of room in the higher gears. Just my $0.02.

"The melting point of wax means nothing to me": Thrice

jerallen's picture
Posts
117
Member
1244 days
jerallen posted 1 year ago.

Good points everyone, I will switch to the 53-39. I would never buy a 55t chainring on my own, but for some reason Felt stocks the 2007 DA with it.

TriSooner's picture
Posts
2433
Member
821 days
TriSooner posted 1 year ago.

UFTriGator wrote:
edit: I started writing this before TriSooner posted and got distracted before I finished.....but looks like we pretty much said the same thing.

Yes, but your answer is more technical :) Gear ratios and combinations hurt my brain. I just know what feels right.

jhudalla's picture
Posts
729
Member
787 days
jhudalla posted 1 year ago.

I know I could have used a bailout - I run a 55/11 and daym... the 'HILL' at IMC nearly killed me. People were walking up that muther... I stupidly ( or not ) pounded it. I was fried afterwards.

Do w/ the 53

Weary is the path that does not challenge.