Vehicles (continued)
I just went through this, with the same train of thought! I went with the Honda Ridgeline. Best of luck!
+1 on new cars. i am getting my new jeep patriot in a week. down sizing from my cherokee due to bad gas mileage.
go red wings!
go pistons!
I just went through this, with the same train of thought! I went with the Honda Ridgeline. Best of luck!
I LIKE the Ridgeline but again, the mileage isn't that great. 15-20 v. 20-26.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out my Log: http://www.felog.net/users/teamsln/query_log.aspx
Check out my Blog: http://www.felog.net/feblog/
Yeah the newer Rav4 is much better than the old one -- and I think the newer CRV has less room than the older one. When I was looking it was a couple feet shorter than the CRV, and that + rude and unhelpful dealer made me head back to the Honda.
True on the mileage....but for me, the comfort of carrying 5 passengers, a full foldable rear seating area perfect for sliding your bike inside, and still a small truck cargo bed with lockable trunk.....mmm, mmm, it got me. Not taking anything away from the Toyo.....just looked it up online, looks perfect for an SUV with bike holding capabilities!!!
Brought home my new ride today, 1975-76 Motobecane Grand Record, black/red combo, 531 aluminium, original Nuovo Record Campagnolo parts group, mint. Caught a glimpse of it out of the corner of my eye riding past a yard sale, $30. Single passenger, great mileage.
john
Pain is inevitable. Suffering is optional.
Ha Ha, great by cayman!
True on the mileage....but for me, the comfort of carrying 5 passengers, a full foldable rear seating area perfect for sliding your bike inside, and still a small truck cargo bed with lockable trunk.....mmm, mmm, it got me. Not taking anything away from the Toyo.....just looked it up online, looks perfect for an SUV with bike holding capabilities!!!
Trust me, next to the FJ Cruiser, the Ridgeline is in that list of vehicles I'd rather own. But I'm my mind, the immediate way to fight this gas price problem is through less consumption. I cannot drive less, partly because I do a lot of driving for work an partly because I don't want to. My truck gets about 15 MPG, and at a minimum the RAV4 will get 20 MPG. At $4 per gallon, that's a $15 saving per fill up, and I fill up about 3-4 times a week.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out my Log: http://www.felog.net/users/teamsln/query_log.aspx
Check out my Blog: http://www.felog.net/feblog/
Today we went and looked at the Toyota Rav4 V6. It seems silly to look at the four cylinder when the mileage is essentially the same. First impressions... I like it. It's less manly than the Rogue but more manly than the CRV. Obviously it has great power but the real selling point for me is the back. It's huge! It has way more usable space than the CRV and I have no doubt it will hold two bikes easily. I think this will be my next vehicle.
I really really like my Honda Element. The way the back seats fold up for tons of room for bikes. And the plastic floors means I don't worry about putting the mountain bike in when it is covered in mud. I can roll all my bikes upright into the back of it (except for the 29" single speed).
I should mention also that the back seats are full size seats which is nice too.
The only down side is that it only has four seat belts (because of the way the rear seats fold).
--
"Outside a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside a dog it is too dark to read."
Groucho Marx
for athletes http://rogercortesi.com/athleticlog/
for nerds http://rogercortesi.com/eqn/
Brought home my new ride today, 1975-76 Motobecane Grand Record, black/red combo, 531 aluminium, original Nuovo Record Campagnolo parts group, mint. Caught a glimpse of it out of the corner of my eye riding past a yard sale, $30. Single passenger, great mileage.
Actually, that would be steel- not Alum.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_531
And a GREAT score!
Life is short. Play hard and get dirty doing it.
Trust me, next to the FJ Cruiser, the Ridgeline is in that list of vehicles I'd rather own. But I'm my mind, the immediate way to fight this gas price problem is through less consumption. I cannot drive less, partly because I do a lot of driving for work an partly because I don't want to. My truck gets about 15 MPG, and at a minimum the RAV4 will get 20 MPG. At $4 per gallon, that's a $15 saving per fill up, and I fill up about 3-4 times a week.
Risk of thread-jacking be damned... If you want to know what I think, the problem is not the price... the problem is the consumption. Reducing consumption will do little to reduce the price of gas. High price is here to stay, as speculation drives the price of oil up due to the perceived inevitable shortage of oil in the coming years. Instead of trying to drive down price by decreasing demand, we should try to increase demand for alternatives. I'm certainly not perfect in this, but I do what I can.
Tell your government that you won't sit by while they let the oil lobby talk them into letting America's wasteful, use more mentality continue...
/rant
Risk of thread-jacking be damned... If you want to know what I think, the problem is not the price... the problem is the consumption. Reducing consumption will do little to reduce the price of gas. High price is here to stay, as speculation drives the price of oil up due to the perceived inevitable shortage of oil in the coming years. Instead of trying to drive down price by decreasing demand, we should try to increase demand for alternatives. I'm certainly not perfect in this, but I do what I can.Tell your government that you won't sit by while they let the oil lobby talk them into letting America's wasteful, use more mentality continue...
/rant
Thread Jack away, I like the discussion. The problem is that I think the game is rigged and therefore feel I should focus my attention on something else.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist but I do believe that anything that will harm the profits of the oil companies will get bought up and stored away for safe keeping.
The government needs to demand change and they need to create incentives. But as long as lobbyists control the politicians, I think the game will remain rigged.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out my Log: http://www.felog.net/users/teamsln/query_log.aspx
Check out my Blog: http://www.felog.net/feblog/
An interesting video on it from Chris Lieto's blog...
An interesting video on it from Chris Lieto's blog...
Clever.
The problem I have with bioethanol is we're going from one large lobby group to another. It's hard to tell whether this is really a viable option or the clever marketing of another group of lobbyists pushing their agenda.
I know that it's rather expensive to make, which would probably decrease as the demand and production increased but I also think it's rather harmful to the environment to produce... but don't quote me on that. But then again, this also might change with the increased demand and production.
I think the cost to convert a vehicle is rather inexpensive so maybe doing something is better than nothing. I wonder what impact it would have on the industry if we did start converting all of our corn to fuel though. Pretty much everything has high frutcose corn syrup in it. That McDonald's meal might get quite expensive very soon.
Lots of things to consider...
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out my Log: http://www.felog.net/users/teamsln/query_log.aspx
Check out my Blog: http://www.felog.net/feblog/
ethanol is a bit of a hoax (i use that word hoax very lightly) and reeks of farm lobbyist influence (calling it "bio-ethanol" is just greenwash). it doesn't really put a dent in the petroleum market and it abuses the agriculture market by overloading it for producing fuel instead of food
100% biodiesel is however something that is a real alternative without changing too much technology. the lower blends have the same problem as ethanol, relying on petroleum again and also putting more particulate into the air than conventional engines; although Mercedes and VW just announced cleaner diesels for next year. Biodiesel does have the problem of putting a burden on the agriculture market, though the lack of harmful offgassing makes it better than ethanol.
the electric or electric hybrids still use power, though it's buried in the grid, and they don't off gas as much...they really are temporary or interim models of transportation until the real breakthrough occurs.
fuel cells look promising but few companies are pushing it as a viable market to pursue...honda just started advertising in the US for a fuel cell car available this year.
Adam
Tri-ac
Interesting on the honda... here is their info on it. Definitely reads like they want everyone to love it, of course ;) It is missing some details I'd be interested in.
Whether or not we think that Fuel Cells are THE solution, they are a step in the right direction. IMO, bio diesel, and ethanol offer little to help the cause except for reducing foreign dependency. The Farm lobby and the Corn lobby are just as real and dangerous as the Oil lobbyists.
I would really like to see us develop more options like the FC cars and see how those end up affecting things. Perhaps it's not viable, or profitable, or whatever... point is that eventually, the industry's willingness to take risks similar to the FC vehicles will eventually lead to a better option which will be cheaper, more efficient, and more profitable for them. At least, that's what the Free Market economic models are supposed to say, right? If someone can come up with a way to make cars run better, cheaper, faster, longer, they will be the winners.
Until then, I'll be busy driving my '93 Honda Accord into the ground.
Until then, I'll be busy driving my '93 Honda Accord into the ground.
I loved my 93 Accord -- until it got driven into the ground ;)
I'm not a fan of fuel cells as I don't believe their efficiency is really worth it. The "hydrogen economy" would be a complete waste and I'm glad that is almost dead. Ethanol as its being done now is IMO a blight on the economy.
I agree with tri-ac that biodiesel is where it's at right now. A lot of progress is being made on producing it from algae which would remove it from being an agricultural burden.
I do think that electric is the way to go, though. Kill off a few coal fired plants and replace them with nuclear and renewable sources (especially as solar increases in efficiency) and there'll be power enough for everyone without dumping massive amounts of pollutants.
In the mean time, I'll stick with my Corolla and keep on hypermiling
Ok, well, since we started talking about this, I found an interesting article yesterday in the New York Times.
Pretty relevant, so I thought I would share.
Ok, well, since we started talking about this, I found an interesting article yesterday in the New York Times.Pretty relevant, so I thought I would share.
TROLL!!!!!!!! It's so obvious that you wrote that article. I like the mustache, btw.
That was an interesting article. One of my biggest pet peeves is when people claim to be all green and are condescending to anyone who drives a car or uses air conditioning or whatever. But I'm all for making positive change. I definitely don't think we're making the most of what we have.
I don't think the situation is as bad as many would like to believe, but there are always going to be plenty of paranoid people. If it's not global warming, it's aliens. If it's not aliens, it's little cameras in all our TV's that the government uses to watch us. Honestly, someone was once telling me that you should always put a blanket over your TV when you're not watching it so the feds can't see you.
"The melting point of wax means nothing to me": Thrice
In the mean time, I'll stick with my Corolla and keep on hypermiling
"hypermiling", huh? some good stuff there, but some are a little off the charts...some of my favorites:
19) Avoid stops at bottom of hills
22) Avoid bad weather
24) Drive when it's warm out
44) Conserve momentum: avoid stopping
46) "Drive without brakes"
47) Drive shoeless
51) Encourage a pass: the fake turn
54) Engine off coasting
48) Conserve momentum: brake hard
88) Use a beaded seat cover
103) Drive like you ride a bike
105) Listen to slower music
but they do say...
"Note that the list on this page describes some techniques that may be illegal in some areas, and potentially unsafe (or inconsiderate) depending on the traffic situation where they're used.
So don't be stupid!"
Adam
Tri-ac
Socket wrote:In the mean time, I'll stick with my Corolla and keep on hypermiling"hypermiling", huh? some good stuff there, but some are a little off the charts...some of my favorites:
19) Avoid stops at bottom of hills
22) Avoid bad weather
24) Drive when it's warm out
44) Conserve momentum: avoid stopping
46) "Drive without brakes"
47) Drive shoeless
51) Encourage a pass: the fake turn
54) Engine off coasting
48) Conserve momentum: brake hard
88) Use a beaded seat cover
103) Drive like you ride a bike
105) Listen to slower musicbut they do say...
"Note that the list on this page describes some techniques that may be illegal in some areas, and potentially unsafe (or inconsiderate) depending on the traffic situation where they're used.
So don't be stupid!"
I read another article where the hypermiling techniques were being evaluated by a law enforcement official...it was funny to see his reaction to some like engine off coasting, which is clearly dangerous in traffic. But hey, some of those people get upwards of 80-90mpg
BTW, don't engine off coast with power steering, power brakes, etc. as they only work with the engine running. I increased my distance/tank by ~100 miles so far, but I won't go for the extreme stuff. Now if I can just get a job nearby so I can stop driving almost completely... ;-)
One thing I do is turn of my car when I am waiting for the train. OK, unless it's an Amtrak. But if it's a big cargo train, my car goes off immediately. It's amazing how many people just sit there in their cars wasting gas for more than 5 minutes... Even if it's only a couple of minutes, it's better than sitting there idling. And, I don't buy the "excuse" that starting-up your engine does more damage than leaving it running, or that the surge from starting it will actually burn more fuel than idling.
I don't want to be one of those smug "greenies" that preaches about how everyone needs to stop driving. Let me be clear: I drive >20 miles a day. For me, it is unavoidable. I wish I could do something about it, but I can't. I can't afford a hybrid. I certainly can't afford an Electric Vehicle... This is why I call upon the government to do something. >>steps onto Democratic soapbox<< It's the job of the government to help people find ways to be more energy efficient, or better, to encourage the private sector to develop solutions that will help fight global warming, and to provide incentives, and assistance to actually make these products accessible to the average American.
Think about this... for all the problems American car manufacturers are having, why are they not trying to do something about this? And why is the government not doing anything to encourage them to find a solution? Clearly, Honda and Toyota have discovered that being efficient sells cars. That's a large portion of their market. Why have American manufacturers largely ignored this market, and instead, opted to subsidize their gas-hogs (read:Jeep/Dodge/Chrysler)? If the government is so willing to subsidize corn (for HFCS and Ethanol), why don't they divert some funding to help car makers come up with something different? Wait... I know... it's because the corn farmers lobby that they want more money to grow corn. But the car makers lobby that they just want to keep doing whatever they hell they want to... Don't get me wrong... they have a reason, right? For an already struggling company, it's much easier to keep doing what you are doing. The combustion engine has been the same for a long time... why reinvent the wheel, right?
I think they did a Mythbusters about whether or not it burns a ton of gas to start your car, and they totally busted the myth that you burn more gas starting your car than you do letting it run. I'm also trying to be better about turning off my car when I'm stuck at a train or any other time it doesn't need to be running (like when I'm 5 feet from the bumper of the semi in front of me on the freeway).
"The melting point of wax means nothing to me": Thrice
I think they did a Mythbusters about whether or not it burns a ton of gas to start your car, and they totally busted the myth that you burn more gas starting your car than you do letting it run.
Yeah, they did the same one with lightbulbs being turned on and off...Always turn them off if not needed
ChunkyB wrote:I think they did a Mythbusters about whether or not it burns a ton of gas to start your car, and they totally busted the myth that you burn more gas starting your car than you do letting it run.Yeah, they did the same one with lightbulbs being turned on and off...Always turn them off if not needed
Now that I think of it, I might have been mixing that episode up with one of the many gas mileage myths they've done. At any rate, logic tell me that it doesn't make sense that your car takes a ton of gas just to start.
"The melting point of wax means nothing to me": Thrice
jsk85 wrote:ChunkyB wrote:I think they did a Mythbusters about whether or not it burns a ton of gas to start your car, and they totally busted the myth that you burn more gas starting your car than you do letting it run.Yeah, they did the same one with lightbulbs being turned on and off...Always turn them off if not needed
Now that I think of it, I might have been mixing that episode up with one of the many gas mileage myths they've done. At any rate, logic tell me that it doesn't make sense that your car takes a ton of gas just to start.
I never heard the gas reason, but always heard it was better for your engine/maintenance/etc not to turn on and off as much. I wonder how real that is. And I'm also curious about the emissions factor of doing that... are emissions worse when the engine is started?
We just bought a 2008 Honda Element. LOVE IT!. Put a little Saris Thelma for longer trips and we just got back from a 1/2 IM in GA and everything fit perfectly, including all our doggie stuff!
Had previously decided on a Rav 4 but the guy there was so rude and were going to rip us off on my hubby's trade...I asked the guy 2x to change his tone with me (one of those who just think women are dirt) and he flat out told me no he won't...told him to go bring my husband's car around and we left. Bought the Element the next day. The Honda people gave us a more than fair offer on the big ole 1999 Eddie Bauer Expedition and really were wonderful to us. We almost bought an Odyssey, but we don't have kids yet, so we'll hold off. We thought it would be cool to have bikes and 4 people in at the same time!!
Element is great on gas, fun to drive, and very comfy! We got the SC.








Today we went and looked at the Toyota Rav4 V6. It seems silly to look at the four cylinder when the mileage is essentially the same. First impressions... I like it. It's less manly than the Rogue but more manly than the CRV. Obviously it has great power but the real selling point for me is the back. It's huge! It has way more usable space than the CRV and I have no doubt it will hold two bikes easily. I think this will be my next vehicle.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out my Log: http://www.felog.net/users/teamsln/query_log.aspx
Check out my Blog: http://www.felog.net/feblog/