Quantcast

Tanita Body Fat Scales

tsilcyc's picture
Posts
434
Member
684 days
started by tsilcyc on April 21, 2008

We don't have a scale in the house so I thought I'd buy one of the Tanita body fat scales. Upon looking at the reviews, I see comments about the scale working well but the body fat portion of it being junk. Am I wasting my money?

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out my Log: http://www.felog.net/users/teamsln/query_log.aspx
Check out my Blog: http://www.felog.net/feblog/

iamtb13's picture
Posts
35
Member
32 days
iamtb13 posted 3 weeks ago.

I'd skip it. It does well for just weight but the body fat % is way different (higher) than what is taken by a professional. I heard that the scales are not adjusted for atheletes. I believe there are some athlete based scales out there but I don't know any personally.

swimmer52's picture
Posts
26
Member
162 days
swimmer52 posted 3 weeks ago.

I have a Tanita that gives weight, body fat %, hydration, calories to sustain and bone mass.
The body fat % fluctuates a lot depending on how hydrated you are. When I'm more hydrated it gives a good reading (meaning lower, yea!) but when I'm dehydrated it's higher (poo). Even if the actual number isn't correct I like to watch the trends and find that helpful.
Frankly I'm more interested in the hydration because I can do something about that if a race is coming up. The rest of the info is just interesting to read, from my perspective that is.

"Whether you think you can or can't, you're right"

tsilcyc's picture
Posts
434
Member
684 days
tsilcyc posted 3 weeks ago.

swimmer52 wrote:
I have a Tanita that gives weight, body fat %, hydration, calories to sustain and bone mass.
The body fat % fluctuates a lot depending on how hydrated you are. When I'm more hydrated it gives a good reading (meaning lower, yea!) but when I'm dehydrated it's higher (poo). Even if the actual number isn't correct I like to watch the trends and find that helpful.
Frankly I'm more interested in the hydration because I can do something about that if a race is coming up. The rest of the info is just interesting to read, from my perspective that is.

I like the idea of monitoring hydration. Which model do you have?

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out my Log: http://www.felog.net/users/teamsln/query_log.aspx
Check out my Blog: http://www.felog.net/feblog/

GGehrke's picture
Posts
164
Member
151 days
GGehrke posted 3 weeks ago.

I have read that the only way to get an accurate body fat measure is by autopsy. I don't think you want to be doing that on any regular basis, so no matter what you do you're going to get an inaccurate measure.

However, you kind of have to think about accuracy versus consistency. It has been my experience that the scales give a pretty consistent measure as long as you either measure at the same time of day or are willing to do a bit of averaging. Much more consistent, in fact, than pinching calipers or even hydrostatic weighing (both of which I've done, my mom is an exercise science professor, so I had access to all of this stuff growing up). It is affected by hydration levels and things like that, but I can usually spot the outliers pretty easily. I usually see a variation of no more than +/- 1.5% from what I believe to be my actual. I would like, at some point, to validate my scale against calipers and hydrostatic techniques, to get a feel for whether it reads high or low compared to the others.

For me, I got the scale to track progress. Starting last summer I plotted readings in excel and was able to observe a distinct downward trend from 12ish% down to 8ish%. I don't really care whether I actually started at 12 or am currently at 8, but seeing if there was actually a trend was important. I did also observe a slight DOWNWARD trend in the scale's "lean mass" reading, which doesn't make much sense, so I certainly don't believe the readings to be infallible.

My scale (Tanita non-Ironman) does have an "athlete" mode, which it says does the calculation differently. They define "athlete" as working out 2hrs/day, 6 days a week, which IMO is pretty intense for something that's aimed at the general public. I don't think you need to actually be training at that high of a level to use it, but rather just have an "athletic build." I think they were just trying to dissuade everyone who jogs on the treadmill occasionally from entering themselves as "athletes."

I do regret, however, not getting the "Ironman" edition scale. Reason is, my scale calculates DCI (Daily Caloric Intake) rather than BMR (Basal Metabolic Rate). DCI is just BMR multiplied by an activity factor, which you enter when you set up the scale (i.e. 0=sedentary, 4=manual labor day job + daily workouts). I don't ever pay attention to the DCI figure because it tells me I can eat 3600cal/day, when I know that on less active days that's not true. I would rather see my BMR and adjust up accordingly. I suppose I could reset it to "sedentary," but the Ironman scales just show you BMR.

big 3's picture
Posts
163
Member
341 days
big 3 posted 3 weeks ago.

I have a model which stores 3 or 4 users. So it can give the body fat reading for each user quickly.
There is also a button for weight and no body fat reading. I use that button all the time now.
I was curious about the body fat % at first, but it's all over the place and not useful to me.
I do like that it has .5 pound increments.

jsk85's picture
Posts
209
Member
120 days
jsk85 posted 3 weeks ago.

I'd have to agree with GGerhke on the bodayfat %. I have a cheapy hand-held bodyfat device and I'm certain the numbers aren't accurate, but I just look at the trends to ensure I'm on the right track. The caveat being to measure at the same time and under the same conditions...this is usually solved by just measuring when you wake up.

TriSooner's picture
Posts
339
Member
148 days
TriSooner posted 3 weeks ago.

swimmer52 wrote:
The body fat % fluctuates a lot depending on how hydrated you are.
I have had a Tanita BF% scale for well over five years and yes, the reading changes based on how hydrated you are. I like my Tanita scale. While I don't take any single reading too seriously, I do take several measurements per day, log them, and average them, and it does seem to correlate to the feedback I get from the mirror.

Ironman Germany, July 6, 2008

o2Ripper's picture
Posts
247
Member
1272 days
o2Ripper posted 3 weeks ago.

My buddy has the BC558 Tanita Ironman scale, and although body fat fluctuates with hydration, it is a pretty awesome tool. :) The hydration feature is cool. I like it. But then again, I didn't pay the approx $4-500 for it. ;p

-Branden
"Its an addiction"

cayman's picture
Posts
686
Member
638 days
cayman posted 3 weeks ago.

I used a neighbors out of curiosity and it recorded my age as 27 years old--metabolically speaking that is-- works for me! ;D

john
I don't need to get faster, I just need to get older!

Sully800's picture
Posts
350
Member
240 days
Sully800 posted 3 weeks ago.

The reading on my tanita scale won't display a body fat below 5%. It must be programmed as a built in minimum. I recorded my weight and body fat almost every day last year and I spent 2-3 months with readings of 5.0%. But anyway, the weight is a very nice feature compared to spring operated scales, and as everyone else said the BF% is useful when you are comparing it to past readings. The scale I got was $120, discounted to $40 on Amazon- money well spent IMO.