More than I can chew?
6 hours isn't much for a half. most plans want you to double that. for mine (i've done 3) i did up to 13 or 14 hours. and i think one can get by with fewer hours with years of training under their belt. but a newbie definately is pushing it. you will finish but it will be ugly. and i think it depends on where the half is within your schedule -- is it the end of the year, middle, etc? if the end, you will probably fare better given the extra time to get in shape, experience, etc. sorry to rain on your parade. good luck.
last summer i did a 70.3 which was my first tri. i pretty much ran every day, biked twice a week (never even biked past 45 miles), and swam once a week, probably about 7 hours of training a week, it was not what i had planned on doing, raceday i was totally nervous, thinking that i would do horrible but i ended up finished in under 5:30 (which was my goal). in my uneducated opinion if time is your issue just make sure to build up to a few long bricks before race day and you should be fine.
You can complete the 1/2, just don't go in expecting to race it. Go in with a survive it attitude
My blog: http://jsktri.blogspot.com
Picking out the positives...
The half is in August. It's my last scheduled race of the season.
To second what has been said, 6 hours a week is low for Half IM training. You'd probably finish, but it might be more of a survival/death march than you'd like. Advice? Between now and August take every weekend chance you have to get in long bikes (3+ hours) and long runs (2+ hours). You can get in 2,000m swims during the week.
Ironman Germany (July 6, 2008)
You can only train as much as you have time for, so there's no use stressing about that part of the situation. Focus on a few key workouts, as well as a nutrition plan and proper pacing for race day.
I would at least get some longer runs and rides in before the half, and maybe even a race specific brick. Make sure you can run at least 10 miles in a single session. Attempt to get a few Saturday mornings to yourself when you can ride 45-60 miles in a single workout.
Also, try to do a brick about 6 weeks before the half where you mimic the half. Do a (roughly) 56 mile bike at your HIM pace while practicing your nutrition plan for the race, and then follow it with a 1 hour run. Hopefully this workout will give you the confidence that you can finish the race.
1 x 60 min run = 1 hour - race pace
1 x 30 min swim = .5 hour - just swim the distance
1 x 60 min bike = 1 hour - fast rollers
1 x 30 min run = .5 hour - fast rollers
1 x 180 min bike = 3 hour - race pace
That's 6 hours and doable. When is the half? You could completely mix up 6 hours and get this to work. I'd focus more on bike and run. Just swim to survive. You could shorten the bike by 30 and add 30 to the long run or add another run. Subtle variations would make it better.
EDIT: Missed the part about the race being in August.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out my Log: http://www.felog.net/users/teamsln/query_log.aspx
Check out my Blog: http://www.felog.net/feblog/
Here's a little more history:
I did a lot of biking last year (a few supported century rides, and lots of 40 - 60 mile solo rides). I'm not particularly fast (18-20 mph avg on the flats), but pretty solid. I have only done about 100 miles on the tri bike (purchased a month ago) so far.
I started learning how to swim in August last year. I've been swimming pretty regularly three days a week since then. I'm finally comfortable with 2000+ meters in the pool. I typically follow the swim workout with a bike ride and/or a run of an hour or so each. (The bike/run portion has been in spinning classes and on the treadmill because of the early hours and cold weather.)
One of my favorite workouts I've been doing is running to the gym (6 miles), swimming 1500 in the pool, and then running back home (another 6 miles).
I hate the treadmill. I'm tired of spin classes.
Now that it's warming up outside, I plan to spend most my time biking and running. Sounds like the TriFuel gurus agree with that focus.
...death march...
At least you make it sound like fun. :)
You can do it! And I'll be waiting for your RR to see if I could move my HIM plans up a year... ;-)
I have similar time constraints given my priorities are my wife, my two sons, and my career. Training time averages about 6 to 7 hours per week. Have never ever trained more than 10 hours in any week. But there's no free-lunch: the effect is you have to limit your expectations for finish-times. I've done many halves and two full IMs. And i get what I pay for: my halves have never quite broken below 6 hours (close though) and my last full IM (Arizona '06) was 14:45. I figure I'll get decent times in a few years when my sons grow up and I'm an empty-nester. But know what? I'm as proud of those two mediocre IM finishes as the guys that did sub-12-hours.
The comments are interesting and I think I know the answer to the question I will pose, but..... I am in need of advice on the same thing. I am considering doing a HIM in September and typically can only train about an average of 6-8 hours a week. I ran a half marathon in March in 1:57 but had never run more than 10 miles before that. I ride a fair amount but usually either spin or do group rides a few times a week of around 30-40 miles. I started training with power but have not seen the benefit that I would like to see so I am considering just picking a race distance and doing a program that is tailored to around 8 hours a week. I just got in the water recently and did a workout that someone posted on trifuel that I have found great. It is the 300 warmup, 4x50 at race pace w 10 sec rest, 4x100, 4x200, 500 w pull buoy and felt pretty good in the water. I had a very bad swim at Xterra Nevada last year, pretty much panicked but finished. Since I am pretty slow(my last 5k was around 7:19 pace but this kills me) compared to anyone higher than mid-pack, I have recently thought I could maybe be better in the longer distances, like halves but clearly not full IM's. I think I am in the same boat as the original poster in that I will probably be able to finish but will suffer, especially in the swim and run. Any advice or is it just best to pick a program and do it?
I guess I ask the question as it is amazing to me that folks I have seen posting can train around the 6-8 hour per week mark and break 6 hours for a HIM or finish an IM. I would be stoked out of my mind if I could do something anywhere near that.
You can do it.... I've never done a half so I don't really have the experience to back it up, but I think that if you can do the distances separately in your training, you can do them in a race. Make sure to get in some 3-4 hour rides. Once I had a good base, I went a 2:40 Oly on about 12 hours of training total for the 8 weeks before the race. I've also gone sub 2:25 averaging about 7 hour per week. Once you have a good base, especially on the bike, you can do a lot on that with very little training. I think that as long as you pace yourself appropriately, it should be no problem (that said, I've never done it...).
I am considering doing a HIM in September and typically can only train about an average of 6-8 hours a week. ...
As I mentioned previously, this seems doable although not ideal. With 8 hours I could see a little more variety in the plan that would allow you to focus the training a little better.
You want to build base and the best way to do that is on the bike. Focus on rides longer than three hours. Put a 30 min run onto the end of that ride.
With your extra two hours, you can add a few more workouts to what I have above. There are plans that list key workouts. You could adopt one of those and do the key workouts plus whatever else will fit.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out my Log: http://www.felog.net/users/teamsln/query_log.aspx
Check out my Blog: http://www.felog.net/feblog/
Thank you. I will bump up the length of rides as I know if I am better on the bike that I won't be as fried for the run.
Please don't butcher me over this. I hesitate to even bring it up here. But here goes.
My biggest hang up is that earphones are illegal in the race. I really quite enjoy running 10 or 15 miles when I have something blasting in my ears. Without it, though, a run of just about any distance is mostly miserable.
Since I'm not trying to podium anyway, am I better off breaking the "no tunes" rule and taking the time penalty? Any of you ever done this?
You are signing up for an event, so play by their rules. To me that would be about the same as signing up with a buddy you plan to draft with the whole time and then saying you will take the penalty for doing so. There will be more to see and pay attention to during the race -- and more you might need to be aware of. For the safety of yourself and others, please respect the RULE about no music. And depending on the event, the rules can be a DQ for headphones.
Miles of Life --- Powered by MarkyV
I run with earbuds/Ipod almost exclusively, but when it comes to running events or triathlon events I just do without them.
So I would just do without if I were you. It's not a biggie.
Like Kylie said, in some races like IM its a DQ. Don't race with them.









I need some advice. I've signed up for a handful of events this year (3 sprints, 3 olys, and 1 half). All I have on my resume so far is two sprints, both of which were reversed (swim last) and pool swims because of cold weather. First oly distance is May 10.
Here's the problem. Try as I might, I can't get more than about six hours of training per week because of the typical time war between work, kids, wife, church, etc (that we all face to some degree or another). I think six hours is probably enough to get me through the olys, but I'm freaking out about the half.
I can swim the 1.2
I can bike the 56
I can run the 13.1
Doing them back to back, however, as we all know, is another story.
Have I bitten off more than I can chew? Am I going to crash and burn on the half? Or do I just need a little confidence booster?
I anxiously await your sound advice.