Quantcast

Dear Santa, please bring me one of these...

tsilcyc's picture
Posts
434
Member
684 days
started by tsilcyc on March 5, 2008

"The 7-pound road bike - Start with a set of $15,000, 850-gram Lew wheels. Then shave off all that excess material."

http://www.velonews.com/article/73034

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out my Log: http://www.felog.net/users/teamsln/query_log.aspx
Check out my Blog: http://www.felog.net/feblog/

Tribro's picture
Posts
2195
Member
2227 days
Tribro posted 10 weeks ago.

That's crazy. I like the the link to light bikes. (http://www.light-bikes.com/BikeGallery/) want to get me a light single speed to take into the trails this summer.

tsilcyc's picture
Posts
434
Member
684 days
tsilcyc posted 10 weeks ago.

I like the part where he takes a $15,000 set of wheels and starts shaving them down. I'm not shaving ANYTHING that cost $15K!

That site makes me want to get a big fat Huffy, break it down and weigh it, and then post it. :) What's a Huffy weigh these days... 40... 50?

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out my Log: http://www.felog.net/users/teamsln/query_log.aspx
Check out my Blog: http://www.felog.net/feblog/

JamieM's picture
Posts
825
Member
1172 days
JamieM posted 10 weeks ago.

I notice they don't post a price. Second mortgage anyone?

TriSooner's picture
Posts
339
Member
148 days
TriSooner posted 10 weeks ago.

As a one-of-a-kind bike, it probably is priced at "if you have to ask . . ." Not to take anything away from this bike (or the guy), because it is impressive engineering, but doesn't the UCI (or whomever governs the TdF) have weight limits (ie, the bike has to weigh a certain minimum)? Plus, for the typical rider, I think it is specious to fork over several hundred dollars to shave off a few hundred grams. For example, my Mavic SSC SL's ($850) weigh in at 1485 grams. I could spend roughly $2,000 for a pair of Zipp 404's and shave off a whopping 250 grams! Wow! 1/2 of a pound! You know riders do this all the time: obsess over 500 grams (~ 1 lb) here, 500 grams there - when they would be better served to lose weight in their gut. Nothing funnier than seeing someone oozing out of spandex talking about how they switched over to a carbon stem to save 50 grams. Skip the cheeseburger and you'd save 50 pounds.

Sorry about the rant, weight-snobs are a Top 3 peeve of mine. That is still a bad ass bike. I'd love to try it out.

Ironman Germany, July 6, 2008

tsilcyc's picture
Posts
434
Member
684 days
tsilcyc posted 10 weeks ago.

I believe the weight limit is 15 pounds. That's still pretty damn light.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out my Log: http://www.felog.net/users/teamsln/query_log.aspx
Check out my Blog: http://www.felog.net/feblog/

UFTriGator's picture
Posts
1003
Member
786 days
UFTriGator posted 10 weeks ago.

Zipp 404s are a lot faster than K-SLs. The SLs spin up quick enough and are good in tight corners, but their straight line speed doesn't match up and they don't sprint as fast either. (I own both). The 1485 g is for tubulars, too. And 1/2 lb of rotating weight is a lot. Also, 500 g here and 500 g there is 2.2 lbs. The difference in a 16.5 lb bike and an 18.7 lb bike is pretty big. I completely agree that the fat guy buying the carbon stem for weight reasons is dumb (a sprinter buying it for stiffness isn't dumb, though), but there are plenty of very good ways to spend money on light, fast stuff (like Zipps) that will make a significant difference.

______________________________________________
-Matt
Not fast enough.

TriSooner's picture
Posts
339
Member
148 days
TriSooner posted 10 weeks ago.

Those bikes are insane!

Ironman Germany, July 6, 2008

ChunkyB's picture
Posts
548
Member
214 days
ChunkyB posted 10 weeks ago.

I thought the limit was more like 16 pounds. But I don't think this guy has any intentions of riding that bike in UCI races. In fact, I doubt that most people make their bike decisions based on whether or not they are UCI legal.

"The melting point of wax means nothing to me": Thrice

My Blog

TriSooner's picture
Posts
339
Member
148 days
TriSooner posted 10 weeks ago.

UFTriGator wrote:
The difference in a 16.5 lb bike and an 18.7 lb bike is pretty big.
True, when you only consider the weight of the bike. Taking 500 grams here and 500 grams there, or 2.2 lbs as you said, and going from 18.7 lbs to 16.5 lbs is a considerable 12% reduction. But once the 180 lb rider get on the bike, that 2.2 pound reduction isn't that significant. Going from 18.7 to 16.5 - with rider included - is a 1.15% reduction. So if we are only considering weight (not aero of wheels for example), I guess it boils down to whether a 1% reduction in combined weight is worth significanly more $$$ by simply paying for it on the bike. I contend that it is "better" for the rider to lose weight than to expect to get faster by paying for it. (Most people don't want to do this though.) And I'm pointing fingers directly at myself on this one: I could stand to lose 4500 grams (10 pounds) and I'm not talking about my bike.

Ironman Germany, July 6, 2008

RV's picture
Posts
3184
Member
1213 days
RV posted 10 weeks ago.

Shave off even more weight by getting rid of that extra wheel!

http://www.krisholm.com/english/products/images/KHU_29_lg.jpg
With ultra-durable components including the strongest 700c rim available, the KH29 rolls smoothly over bumps and is the fastest choice for cross-country mountain unicycling. Also a top-quality all-round road/hybrid unicycle.

Select Features:

* 7005 T6 aluminum frame
* KH Moment ISIS hub
* New double-hole KH Moment ISIS cranks (125/150 mm)
* Fusion Freeride saddle with dual-density foam and center cutaway
* 700c x 38 mm x 36 hole double wall KH rim
* Choice of knobby Kenda Klaw or smooth tread Schwalbe Big Apple tire.
* High strength 13 gauge spokes (289 mm length)
* Odyssey Jim Cielencki pedals (not shown)
* Magura™ brake compatible
* Weight: 6.20 kg
6.2 Kg is what about 13.64 lbs...

RV

It takes a long time to get good. - Scott Molina
Slow is smooth; smooth is fast. - Rich Strauss

tsilcyc's picture
Posts
434
Member
684 days
tsilcyc posted 10 weeks ago.

This goes back to a previous post where I mentioned I wanted to do a sprint on a Big Wheel. The unicycle would be a nice substitute. Do they make a unicycle with a freewheel?

I think a picture of me in my tri suit, wearing the aero helmet of course, on a unicycle would make an excellent photo. :)

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out my Log: http://www.felog.net/users/teamsln/query_log.aspx
Check out my Blog: http://www.felog.net/feblog/